Introduction
Kiev has stepped up pressure on the Western partners to allow it use weapons, long-range missiles targeting Russia. This move comes at a time when the conflict in Ukraine rises to a significant level where Ukrainian forces commenced operations to retrieve the territories occupied by Russia. The latest visit of the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy to Kyiv signalizes that pressure on the Western countries to heavier arm Ukraine increases.
The Call for Long Range Missiles
President Volodymyr Zelensky has continuously urged for the easing of restrictions on the use of US provided ammunitions pointing that they are crucial in the defense of Ukraine and the counterattack. And with the help of long-range missiles, Ukraine would be able to hit facilities far inside Russian territory – targeting supply chains, military facilities, and command posts. It can change the specifics of the ongoing war in favor of Ukraine and provide this country with a certain advantage.
Western Responses
Although the US and the UK have supplied Ukraine with a massive amount of military equipment, they have so far been cautious about allowing Kiev to use the long-range missile systems. Some of the worries indicate that such weapons can worsen the conflict and lead to the involvement of NATO allies in a direct fight with Russia. However, a concern has always arise on the possibility of these missiles being used by bad actors to strike populated regions.
The Biden Administration’s Stance
US President Joe Biden has stated that the current administration is open to raising the restrictions on Assets with the range of long range missile. However, he has also highlighted on the need for any executive who is contemplating for such a decision to do so with caution when considering the risks that are associated with the decision that is being made. Cabinet has had extensive infighting to factor the tactical factors at play if the White House offers Ukraine with better equipment.
The Constraints We Have to Overcome in Continuing to Ease Lockdowns and Open the Economy
- Escalation Risks: The deployment of the long-range missiles may elicit a more hostile reaction from Russia thus deepening the conflict.
- Civilian Casualties: Some of these missiles may fall in civilian places leading to loss of lives as well as condemnation from all over the world.
- Strategic Implications: Delivering long-range missile systems to Ukraine may provoke a change in the existing strategic equation in the region and radical consequences for the European safety.
- International Law: Long-range missiles or any other weapon shall be employed only in accord with the principles of the international law which implies proportionality and distinction.
FAQs
- What is the reason on the necessity of having long-range missiles in Ukraine? Ukraine is convinced that ground-stand and coastal missile systems are critically needed for its defense and counterattack against Russia. These weapons could well be aimed at the Russian military bases, (and) logistics and command, control and communication facilities.
- What is wrong with supplying Ukraine with long range missiles much like Pentagon officials have done? Some of these are: There is possibility of a long-range missiles extending the fighting with Russia and possibly instigate a broader war. Also there is a possibility of such weapons being used in the wrong side targeting civilian heavily populated areas.
- Questions still linger on how the US government feels about delivering long-range missiles to Ukraine? At the same time, the US administration has weighed options pertaining to possible SES revocation of the no-distancing policy – specifically for Ukraine. However there exist some controversies over whether this is a wise decision or not since there are implications of the decision.
- What impact will the utilization of long-range missiles make for the progression of the battle in Ukraine? The ability to launch long-range missiles could change the course of the war in Ukraine’s favour as compared to Russia. But it could also prolong the conflict beyond that since the L finns have more incentive to drag the conflict out with the Dutch.
Conclusion
The resolution of countering the limitations to the use of long-range missiles by Ukraine has far reaching ramifications for the war as well as European security. Despite Ukraine claimed that these weapons are needed for its defense there are concerns over the dangers of unintended escalation and civilian loss. So as the conflict escalates the western countries have to look at the advantages and disadvantages of providing Ukraine with more enhanced weapons.
+ There are no comments
Add yours